The wind always has beaten me. We have never gotten along. My worst memories in the neighborhood runaway ride on windy days, windy days south. A false air cleaning mood shrank because cleaning was synonymous with distress. Violence. Wind from the south against the house, wind from the south that crossed the little road in a neighborhood lost anywhere. assaulted The windy days merciless mood. Waves, and again struck trees and houses. The neighborhood is teetering on the passing of the winds. Which reached unexpected betrayal. Appeared around the corner and soon took over the corner, corner, nook and cranny. And crazy eddies formed playing with paper, playing with the shit that is stirred in its path. The wind undermined wills, flattened horizons. Played to make us more vulnerable. I never liked. It is the worst forecasts. Although well thought out, the worse it gets as assault without notice. For the evening of windy days are gloomy, pessimistic likely to pour down the side of cyclothymia. Are those holes are bored while themselves to lock us into despair. A coup, another coup, one more. Is there one hears. No choice but to shrink the soul and let isolate the shell as far as possible. a strange color is reflected in the wind. I think that is pale yellow, ocher perhaps by time of day. Color is a bitter, sullen, moaning. It looks like a color that has been impatient with humans and has taken clear stand against them. Acute painless but exudes a chronic disease, which adheres to everything it touches. A rickety color, rough, empty. May have traces of nostalgia, do not say no. But I can hardly see them. Why not. I do not like the wind. Technorati tags
On Thursday Hobest Forum were a couple of hours dancing around the possibility of transforming something, whatever it is, through organizations. My position, anchored strangely optimistic pessimism is simple: transform something using the company as a medium is now something that we must be careful . I'll explain, but a Saturday ;-)
- The company has long dominated the planet . At least one type of business, large, multi-sited and dispersed in its essence and in form. The privatization of this and the other, today and tomorrow, has been causing it, like it or not, we are in his hands. Shoes you wear the shirt, your car, home furniture (congratulations if you have one), your possessions, all that comes from businesses. Company, engine of wealth, business, economic power. In this there is much to pick. But companies have competition. Sure, other companies. No. .. Well, yeah, that too. I mean companies that have been long gone a grain that bothers: their
- people. Because the last line of the income is reduced by another line that moves some boxes above and says staff costs. Yes, people have become competitive companies at the same time that are the basis for that figure to grow sales. A fine mess: the enemy at home and the home ally. You decide the burden of pessimism or optimism that want to weigh in the balance. people compete against companies where, as a society, look at their excesses. The list is huge and from time to time, depending on the degree of belligerence, the fight jump to the pages of traditional media, whether Greenpeace against central Garoña or Nissan hustle against their (dis)
- employer. People feel "different" in the company. There governing other rules and have to survive in a jungle that almost none of us have designed. We came, we saw that had to be careful and so it goes. Meanwhile, companies try to catch up on esoteric way. Now we have with us the programs personal growth. The company provides them to make us better people, higher, stronger, faster. In the slope of the personal human progress, the company is placed on our side and encourages us to let ourselves fall into the hands of our team with blind faith. The two-headed monster of them to use our personal skills and self-esteem grows, as someone said last Thursday, now have the obligation to take a course in motivation . Can not you see clearly; then I'm sorry, in this company is required
Antúnez. The company (less) people, the old story that overflows out of nowhere in the current management. Lee minus depending on your mood. If you live in the world of Barney can avoid reading it. Nothing happens there are always exceptions. Perhaps you are lucky enough to participate in one of them. Ulrich Beck more than ten years ago wrote in his book What is globalization? few terse sentences. Now those gloomy predictions have come true. The two-headed monster called the company, governed by the best of management trained in the best business schools in the best possible world, has led to an unusual crisis. Beck said: "Long live the benefits, death to the jobs!" We read in Der Spiegel . "A special economic miracle has terrorized the nation. In infiltrate business has a new generation of top executives who worship in imitation of the U.S., the share of stock. Fateful results: rewards bag job destroyers. " So now, when we turn when we want people to realize their job is no doubt to be beating around the eye. The starting conditions are not best. The companies have maximized their goal of generating wealth. But the worst is the inequitable distribution as among those involved in the generation of that wealth.
People, by the way, do not trust companies. They defend because if not, just lose their health or anything else you appreciate. The twenty-first century society has brought with it the possibility that we know more about how the bar. "careful Transparency she allows us to learn more about the monster with whom we are dealing with. The worst thing is that you do not know where the responsibility. Are they real people?, Who are, is it someone in particular?, Are your managers?, Are your heads?, Is the infantry? It is increasingly difficult to find specific responsibilities. The laws simplify the world and send to jail a person on behalf of the entity. But we all know that this is more complicated. 
I do not think we should "transform" the company taking as starting today. We must change the starting conditions for people to play the "trousers removed. We need projects ex novo . While new initiatives are framed in the current system, as are the old companies. But we need fresh air, a different starting point, a power-sharing not so wicked asymmetrical as given in the current company. We need to do, if you will, from a company more democratic (in the sense that says Gary Hamel in his latest book.) I know that I put heavy, but we need another framework. I, with the current rules, I do not get to transform (almost) nothing. Apologies for the plate Saturday. Congratulations if you've got here. Háztelo look. Technorati tags
, company, management
0 comments:
Post a Comment