Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Latin Dessert Recipies

Finally we will


close this blog that was born March 1, 2005 you go to know why. We moved from home to live that offered WordPress. Gone are 1,426 published articles, printed matter, I would serve to decorate the walls of the new house, incidentally. Mental diarrhea, I said. Apologies to those people you feel assaulted by size incontinence. I will look me in my next life.

Moreover, it was a happy relationship while it lasted. But it was the chronic announced a move. We must move towards territories software free, as far as we can. Small steps, but firm in the decision. And there we go, a post with WordPress.

So it does not matter. I hope that is transparent to you. We'll see how Google finds the change. For those things, I have fatigue partner. The issue is tricky. We continue to read beyond the other side of the neighborhood. We still live here, in a neighborhood that has not stopped growing since we started. Take this opportunity to say hello, they would say on the radio. Keep in touch. Take care of yourself, please.

The photo is taken from: http://blogs.ya.com/norecords/files/mudanza.jpg

Technorati tags . The fact is that, for now, it seems that we are responsible not only to say in every post but what we discussed in our blogs. Curious case. The NGO Reporters Without Borders (RSF) closely monitors complaints from businesses and institutions to various blogs, as it believes it can mean a reduction in freedom of expression, as is happening in many countries, as apparent from its latest report on press freedom (PDF) in the world.
system in which we move you to know that we watched. Although I suppose this applies not only what we do with our blogs but life in general. But in the digital must be beating more carefully. The fingerprint is
long, very long, but the cypress of Miguel Delibes, I fear. We must act with common sense and do not press the button to publish cheerfully. Do nothing you would not do in your "other life" (if you can distinguish them). The world is how it goes.
"Power" and "control" are two words
to have to be careful. seems there was an illogical in all this that is taking over this form of individual or collective expression posed by blogs. According the experts consulted by CONSUMER EROSKI , Law of Services of the Information Society and Electronic Commerce (LSSICE) states in its Article 16 that "service providers brokerage house consisting of data provided by the recipient of this service will not be responsible for the information stored at the request of the recipient in the event they do not have actual knowledge of the activity, or if they do, be diligent in removing them. " However, the author of the blog Wandering was convicted of injury to the right to honor, aplicándosele no exemption from liability under the LSSICE as stipulated by the court ruling, even if part the press law of 1960.
So if you want to prevent, you can subscribe to
law blogs, the blog of David Maeztu, recommended by Consumer. From what I could browse a useful resource in these times of anger. In addition to the article that gives tips on how to deal with a burofax arrives from someone who lashes out at us, more information is available on aspects of intellectual property and licensing

regard. A good address for those who walk delving into this area, as is the case in our research group at the university open enterprise. Tranquility and good food. Be responsible ... far as you can.

Technorati tags
INCRESS
people
. Teamwork: something around which has been, is and will be pages and pages of literature. One of those issues that seems always the holy grail

advanced management

. In this blog I have shown on another occasion my caution in this matter:
Efficiency people and equipment. For a spin more thread, I wonder if the array of social web tools are changing what it is and how it accomplishes this by working together.
For the first question when a team seems to have to be "team" is to meet

. And the word "meeting" look it is overhyped. Of course, in certain business models is obvious. I refer, of course, the cooperative. Meet intensity stands for communication, said the truths in the face, to generate consensus, to debate and discuss until things are indigestible. All this constitutes, of course, the positive side of the issue. But, of course, there is a darker side. Meeting
is slowing the pace of decision takes time and money is put on the table, too often, poor interpersonal relationship skills, is moody, is despair. Yes, the meeting also be considered an evil of our business system. Funny thing the matter is that this sacred tool teamwork "bear" in the best way possible in the social web environment. Multitasking has come in the form of laptops to the meeting tables . And there are several things happen simultaneously: physical meeting and share digital connections scene. Some more, some less, is engaged at some point in the meeting to escape from prison to fly into other territories. May be more hidden or in view of all people, is a question of confidence now. For the traditional wing convener of the meeting, "we should ban laptops." Well worth it. But I'm afraid the 2.0 tooling is becoming evident two indisputable facts:



Nobody focuses 100% emotional and intellectual resources in a meeting for 100% of the time it takes (in another version that people could say placed in a small meeting 50% of its resources). The fragmentation of the occupation forces today to pick from a variety of tasks more and more often (they are running out of three meals for moving to a "dangerous? Constant pecking.) passes my personal efficiency access to tap digital communication Another thing is that you open or close the tap . This is very important. No need to have the water running 100% of the time. It would be folly and would ultimately hurt us. But it is important to know that you have access to open when you see fit. In short, no longer an exercise of personal responsibility. time and space. The meeting itself constrained the contact time and same place. But that was then, now there are alternatives. Although most of the time I'm afraid that is not used because there simply is allowed to invade agendas and our life in general. However, this should not lead them away as an evil in itself. Meetings lose consistency, few people hold more than an hour plugged into an issue with the minimum concentration required.
People have more and more doors to open. And what if the open.
Finally, an important detail technologies can help to reduce costs in contacts. Face meetings can be replaced by increasing use of Skype or other chat tools with video or not. These tools also allow the recording of audio or video of an increasingly simple, so that the contents are re-used by those who have not been able to engage in real time. Keep in mind that new generations coming into the labor market bring different communication standards . The simple and easy it is reviled, but it's smart to use them. And they have their advantages, I think. Although the old site for teamwork are dying. Incidentally, INCRESS people have edited and made accessible you can use these materials without citing the source problem: key elements in the evolution of self-organization of teams
(are little notes about concepts handled in the methodology).




learning equipment (the bulk of the methodology written in 40 pages).


    spreadsheet to automate the responses to questionnaires
  1. .
  2. Technorati tags

0 comments:

Post a Comment